<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to protect your PC from spyware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robwhitehouse.com/windows/how-to-protect-your-pc-from-spyware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robwhitehouse.com/windows/how-to-protect-your-pc-from-spyware/</link>
	<description>A bunch of random notes from working in IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:54:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://robwhitehouse.com/windows/how-to-protect-your-pc-from-spyware/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robwhitehouse.com/software/how-to-protect-your-pc-from-spyware/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Spybot&#039;s Scan And Defend has always been a decent &quot;after the event&quot; application - it&#039;s very good at identifying problems once they&#039;ve already occurred. I agree that it&#039;s a top program - but as a rule I don&#039;t want the malware to get anywhere near my system! I want it to be blocked at the source, not to be repaired and fixed once I&#039;ve been infected to the hills. It&#039;s like why you wear a condom - yes, syphilis can be cured but let&#039;s be fair, you don&#039;t want it in the first place!

Now I&#039;m a realist - I know that total protection is a pipe dream. But I still believe that real-time protection is essential; and that the biggest barrier to this is the bottleneck caused by disk I/O in 99.9% of computers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spybot&#8217;s Scan And Defend has always been a decent &#8220;after the event&#8221; application &#8211; it&#8217;s very good at identifying problems once they&#8217;ve already occurred. I agree that it&#8217;s a top program &#8211; but as a rule I don&#8217;t want the malware to get anywhere near my system! I want it to be blocked at the source, not to be repaired and fixed once I&#8217;ve been infected to the hills. It&#8217;s like why you wear a condom &#8211; yes, syphilis can be cured but let&#8217;s be fair, you don&#8217;t want it in the first place!</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m a realist &#8211; I know that total protection is a pipe dream. But I still believe that real-time protection is essential; and that the biggest barrier to this is the bottleneck caused by disk I/O in 99.9% of computers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evilpandas</title>
		<link>http://robwhitehouse.com/windows/how-to-protect-your-pc-from-spyware/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Evilpandas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robwhitehouse.com/software/how-to-protect-your-pc-from-spyware/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Having got my first bit of spyware in about 2 years I have recomend the old war horse Spybot. It did the job removing the nasty bit of spyware. I mean however good the half naked ladies are on the spyware asking you pay £4 a go they do get annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having got my first bit of spyware in about 2 years I have recomend the old war horse Spybot. It did the job removing the nasty bit of spyware. I mean however good the half naked ladies are on the spyware asking you pay £4 a go they do get annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
